Pure-Light makes no claims concerning being used as a treatment or cure of any kind for any disease.
Our full-spectrum LED light bulbs are coated with titanium dioxide which is a photo-catalyst that removes bacteria, viruses, mold, fungus, odors and toxic chemicals from the air in your home, office, RV, or any other location.
48-inch LED TUBE LIGHTS:
The photocatalytic process breaks down toxic indoor air pollutants like formaldehyde, carbon monoxide, methane, benzene and other VOCs into harmless components. (The main components of deadly "smog")
ANTI-ALLERGEN The process also neutralizes pollen and other allergens. You can literally help make your home hypo-allergenic.
DESTROYS ODORS without masking them with fragrances.
Eliminates the need for harmful chemical sanitizers.
Eliminates aerosols that deplete the ozone layer.
DAYLIGHT BRIGHT FULL SPECTRUM also known as the "HAPPY LIGHT" that helps fight winter blues. (Same type of light used to overcome S.A.D. at 1/2 the cost).
COOL TO THE TOUCH SAFE + Eco-friendly, odorless, non-toxic.
New patent pending technology allows it to work indoors for up to 10 years.
Helps comply with indoor air quality regulations.
Uses 70%-90% less energy compared to incandescent bulbs.
Uses 50% less energy compared to fluorescent lights with no mercury.
Lasts 10-20 times longer than incandescent and fluorescent bulbs.
INSTANT ON, high quality, flicker free lighting.
Produces less heat and reduces fire hazards.
Silent operation with no filters or maintenance.
Fits into any standard light bulb socket.
Great for plants and animals (in actual lab tests, Pure-Light bulbs increased plant growth over regular greenhouse lighting, and plants were healthier overall).
According to the EPA, the air inside your home may be up to 100 times more polluted than the air outside.
Most Americans spend up to 90% of their time indoors. Recent studies have shown that no home is immune to indoor air quality problems. New homes tend to have higher concentrations of chemicals. Older homes are breeding grounds for mold and mildew. And all homes, no matter how clean they appear, are contaminated with airborne bacteria, viruses, fungi and mold.
For children, seniors and those who suffer from allergies or asthma, the effects may be long lasting and devastating. Pollutants in the air in your home can cause aggravated allergies, asthma and other health problems. Spray disinfectants that often just mask an odor, can be harmful to humans and household pets, too.
Please watch the videos below...
PURE-LIGHT EASY CLEAN, ANTI-BACTERIAL KITCHEN AND BATHROOM COUNTER TREATMENT KIT. Put a patented, clear PURE-LIGHT anti-bacterial coating on the surface of your kitchen-bathroom counter, sink, stove, table, etc. with this easy to use kit. The treatment lasts 1 year and makes the surfaces anti-bacterial. No more harsh chemical cleaners needed. Just use simple distilled water and everything just wipes off. It almost cleans itself. Makes surfaces super shiny too! One kit will do approximately 100 square feet of counter surface. These easy to use wipes allow a consumer to put a patented light activated Enhanced TiO2 anti-bacterial coating on a kitchen/bathroom counter, sink, stove, refrigerator, and other surfaces that will last up to 1 year. The transparent titanium coating also makes the surface easier to clean.
Please watch the videos above and listen to the audios below...
This is a multi-tier affiliate program. You can earn commissions on sales made by people that you refer through 4 levels of referral. The compensation plan does NOT require monthly purchases.
Commissions are calculated at the end of the month. Therefore, if a person signs up FOR FREE (ask your sponsor how to join for FREE), but then refers a club member, if the sponsor upgrades and becomes a Gold Club Member before the end of the month, then they will receive commissions for the purchases made by the people that they sponsored that month.
PLEASE REALIZE THAT THIS COMPENSATION PLAN IS UNLIKE MOST OTHER NETWORK MARKETING COMPENSATION PLANS. THIS IS A MULTI-TIER AFFILIATE PROGRAM.
THERE ARE NO MONTHLY PURCHASE REQUIREMENTS.
Rank advancement is based upon the total cumulative number of QUALIFIED Gold Club Members that you have personally referred (who have each placed an order for at least $140).
The $50 Gold Club membership fee will be waived if you order at least $140 worth of product. Gold Club Members can save 50% on THEIR first order or any other order placed within the first 30 days of membership. As a GOLD CLUB MEMBER (after 30 days) you receive a 35% discount and FREE SHIPPING on subsequent orders.
Gold Members (and FREE customers) will receive their own PLT Buyers Club web page for FREE.
There will be NO minimum monthly or annual purchase or sales requirements.
Cash Rewards will be paid monthly. 80% within 20 days, 20% will be held for 90 days against possible returns. (See PLT Buyers Club rules and regulations on the PLT website for more details.)
Laboratory tests comparing the growth of barley grass under LEDs with and without TiO2 showed that the TiO2 coated lights created an environment that doubled the growth rate of the barley grass but reduced the growth of mold by 80%.
Using a new patent pending process, PURE-LIGHT TECHNOLOGIES™ coats light bulbs with an ultra-thin, transparent coating of an enhanced Titanium Dioxide formula (TiO2) that reacts with light to produce free radicals that are attracted to viruses, bacteria, mold volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the surrounding air.
In the oxidative reaction, the positive holes react with the moisture present on the surface and produce a hydroxyl radical and the excited electrons react with atmospheric oxygen to form superoxide radicals. As air comes near the PURE-LIGHT coated light bulbs the free radicals generated by the light bulb help to cleanse the air of bacteria, viruses, mold, and pollutants. The air also gets deodorized as well since almost all odors are volatile organic compounds.
The hydroxyl radical is often referred to as the "detergent" of the atmosphere because it reacts with many pollutants called Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), often acting as the first step to their removal. There is also a secondary PURE-LIGHT effect on the surfaces of items near the light bulb, such as kitchen/bathroom counters, dishes, stoves, cutting boards, door knobs, etc.
THE LIGHT MUST BE ON. It takes about 45min once the light is on for the photocatalytic action to start (for the negative ions to start to be generated).
BULBS MUST BE OPEN TO THE AIR. Putting bulbs in a sealed cover doesn't do any good. They must be open to the air.
A FAN IS NOT NEEDED TO CIRCULATE AIR. The bulbs will work so long as air can naturally circulate near and around the bulb.
THE BULBS CAN BE USED WITH LAMP SHADES. The air needs to be able to circulate around the bulb.
THE MORE BULBS IN A ROOM - THE BETTER. 2-3 Pure-Light bulbs in an average room (15 ft x 15 ft) seem to work the best.
FULL SPECTRUM BRIGHT DAYTIME WHITE LIGHT. Pure-Light LEDs are full spectrum and provide light with a color spectrum that is very similar to natural daylight. They provide all colors of light with an emphasis on red, yellow, and green light (wavelengths between 480-680 nanometers).
10 WARRANTY (on the A19 bulbs) No receipt is needed. Though the bulbs are nearly unbreakable, they can be broken. If the outside of the bulb is damaged, then the warranty is voided. Otherwise, if the bulb fails to perform in any way, simple return it for a replacement bulb.
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT SANITIZATION Pure-Light does NOT use ultraviolet light. Ultraviolet light is deadly to all life forms for a variety of reasons. Including animal life and plant life. Because of this it is used as a method of sterilization. Ultra-violet light IS an effective method of sanitation. Ultraviolet lamps are used in sewage treatment plants, hospital clean rooms and many other areas where killing bacteria, viruses and spores is crucial. Ultraviolet light kills cells by damaging their DNA.
UVC light can initiate a reaction between two molecules of thymine (one of the compounds found in DNA). UVC light can cause adjacent thymine molecules in DNA to stick together or "dimerize". If enough of these defects accumulate on a microorganism's DNA then its ability to replicate is inhibited. The longer the exposure to UVC light, the more thymine dimers are formed in the DNA. If cellular processes are disrupted because of DNA damage, the cell cannot carry out its normal functions. If the damage is extensive and widespread, the cell will die.
The harmful effects from exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation can be classified as acute or chronic. The acute effects of UV-A and UV-B exposure are both short-lived and reversible. These effects include mainly sunburn (or erythema) and tanning (or pigment darkening). The chronic effects of UV exposure can be much more serious, even life threatening, and include premature aging of the skin, suppression of the immune system, damage to the eyes, and skin cancer.
The long term negative effect of ultraviolet light is well documented. The problem is that it damages/kills good cells as well as bad cells. Please note also that it is only partially effective in sanitizing because it only destroys the cells that the ultraviolet light actually shines on directly. Bacteria in the shadows are not affected by ultraviolet light.
However, ultraviolet light is only able to harm cells that it contacts. Even a small crack can hide spores in its shadow, keeping them safe from the UV. Ultraviolet light is also harmful to people (it damages our DNA too!) Ultralight sanitization is possibly a better alternative to some of those other nasty chemicals out there - as long as we avoid direct exposure.
PHOTOCATALYSIS USING NATURAL LIGHT Pure-Light does not produce, use, or need to use harmful UltraViolet (UV) light. Pure-Light uses Super-Oxygen technology. Superoxide molecules are produced by photocatalytic action that occurs on the titanium dioxide coating that is applied to the surface of the bulb. It is the superoxide molecules that provide the sanitizing action, not the light itself. Plants exposed to Pure-Light grow faster and are healthier, and the Pure-Light action can even sanitize deadly bacteria that may be hiding in the shadows.
I got my first bulbs today. Wow do these bulbs light up your space! I also did the heat test: I put two bulbs in a dual socket. One standard 75 watt common bulb and one 9 watt Pure-Light bulb. I turned on both lights for 5 minutes and then I tested the heat. The 75 watt was so hot that if I had held on to it I would had burned my fingers good. The Pure light bulb was warm but I could hold it without burning my fingers. The pure light was so bright. It was brillant and very intense light. Like sun power - Oh my Lord - was it bright! It filled the room with this amazing light that I have not experienced before. I am amazed. Now I really know I have a better lighting in the house. I now am looking over time for other things as air cleaning also some mold I had from the hurricane in October 2017. I am watching and seeing the results. Just 9 watts of power and more brightness. I am very impressed indeed. --Demetrios P, Florida
"My office is next to my boss's office and he is a chain smoker. Even though I have air purifiers in my office it still smells like cigarette smoke all of the time. In desperation I replaced the bulbs in my office with the Pure-Light bulbs. Now, when I come into my office in the morning it smells like stale cigarette smoke. After turning them on about an hour or so, the smell is gone. God bless you. I am trying to get permission to start leaving the lights on in my office all night so that even in the morning it smells clean." --R. Laird, Tennessee
"I am so thrilled! I got the 'Pure Light' light-bulbs in this afternoon, finally! About an hour ago I put 6 bulbs in. 1 in the bedroom, 1 in the bathroom, 2 in the hallway and 2 in my laundry room. Coincidentally, I have been doing laundry all afternoon and what a difference, wow!! So glad I got them. I was a bit skeptical, not knowing what to expect, but they are worth every penny! Thanks Diane, for telling me about them!!! It is like the middle of a lovely summer day in here. Fumes leave very quickly. We got skunk scent here for the first time I have been here, and now that smell is gone (it still smells outside though). People's cooking smell in the hallway, which finds its way in here too, that is gone. Well I am impressed!!! And all the other invisible benefits we read about....that is very good! My kitties are looking around happier and my plants, I am sure will love it! These light bulbs are cool to touch, so it will be great in the summer time, since my regular bulbs give out lot of heat and the unhealthy fluorescent or the energy saver / spiral ones are really bad for us, so I do not used those, never did." --Alena, Canada
"Hello - I would like to provide this testimonial as to the effectiveness of the PURE-LIGHT (PLT) light bulbs. I will preface this by saying the bulbs were first installed while my wife was out of town for a few weeks. The PLT bulbs replaced “normal” LED 9 watt light bulbs and located in a bathroom (where litter boxes are located) and family room (where the dog spends 18 hours per day). We have multiple cats (& one dog) and the resulting background odors associated with pets. The PLT were initially left on overnight for a couple nights and then for 2-3 hours per day. I noticed an immediate reduction of odors overnight and pretty much elimination of odors within one day. My wife returned from her trip and was amazed by the reduction of odors. I had a friend who wanted to try out the PLT bulbs, so I removed my bulbs & installed the normal LED bulbs. My wife walked into the house that night (following a 12 hour shift at the hospital) and immediately asked where “her” PLT bulbs were and “asked” me to re-install immediately. That was proof enough for me as to the effectiveness of the PLT technology." --Troy, Ohio
"I am so thrilled with these light bulbs. I ordered 12 last night through a friend of mine who has seen great results with hers. She allowed me to take 2 home from her order. Upon arriving home I found out my plumbing had backed up and there was a sewer smell throughout my home, primarily in the kitchen. I put a bulb in one of the kitchen sockets and left it on all night. When I awoke this morning and went into the kitchen, there was no more stench! I was so impressed I called and increased my order to 18 bulbs so, I can gift some and put them throughout my home. I am so grateful for this new technology." --Hope H., California
The West Clinic 1188 Call Place Pocatello, ID 83202 www.westcliniconline.com
WHY DO WE HIGHLY RECOMMEND THE NEW PATENTED PURE-LIGHT TECHNOLOGIES ANTI-BACTERIAL BULBS? Here at the West Clinic we have some of the sickest people in the world walk through our doors. We have been searching for ways to limit bacteria and viruses, to protect our patients, their family members and our medical team.
What we found are two revolutionary new products, PLT (Pure-Light Technologies) anti-bacterial light bulbs and anti-bacterial wipes.
According to the manufacture they have been proven to kill 99.9% of bacteria, viruses, fungus, and mold… including MRSA, E-COLI, STAPH, CRE, Salmonella and other diseases...even those viruses and bacteria that have become resistant to antibiotics. Additionally, the Pure-Light light bulbs last up to 20,000.00 hours and the antibacterial wipes for one year.
All we did is replace the light bulbs in our clinic with the new patented Pure-Light anti-bacterial/anti-pollution/anti-allergen light bulbs, and use the new Pure-Light anti-bacterial/anti-allergen surface wipes. We wipe down everything…our counters, door handles, light switches, faucets, and medical equipment, everything that will help reduce bacteria or viruses.
Besides adding the anti-bacterial and anti-allergen protection, we find that odors are reduced and surfaces are easier to clean.
We are using the Pure-Light anti-bacterial light bulbs and surface wipes because we want to:
Protect our patients and their families
Provide a safer work environment for our medical team
Have a cleaner, fresher smelling facility
What we discovered is an economic way to provide added protection for healthier, happier patients and that gives us added peace of mind.
Dr. Jason West
Soon, every hospital, doctor's office, dentist's office, and public building will have Pure-Light™ Super Oxygen bulbs in them!
Where could Pure-Light help to clean the air?
damp and moldy basements
senior care facilities
hair and nail salons
used clothing stores
stores with off-gassing packaging and merchandise
NOTE: If you wish to order more than 12 light bulbs, you can add additional regular LED bulbs one 6-pack at a time. Simply use the pull-down menu to select the number of additional 6-packs you want, and then click on the update button to recalculate your total. THE DIMMABLE BULBS DO NOT WORK IN 3 STAGE FIXTURES.
GOLD CLUB MEMBERS SAVE 50% ON THEIR INITIAL ORDER AND ALL ORDERS WITHIN THEIR FIRST 30 DAYS (SAVE 35% AFTER 30 DAYS)
Gold Club Member Price: $153/DOZEN ($12/bulb) $76.50/6-PACK ($12/bulb)
THESE LIGHTS ARE NOT DIMMABLE. THEY SHOULD NOT BE USED IN 3-WAY LIGHT FIXTURES.
DO NOT USE THEM IN A SITUATION WHERE THEY ARE ATTACHED TO A CIRCUIT THAT IS ATTACHED TO A DIMMER.
Pure-Light bulbs provide APPROXIMATELY the same amount of light (900 lumens) as either a 60-75 watt incandescent bulb, but they only consume 8.7 watts. Please realize that every light bulb is different. Wattage is NOT the proper measurement to determine the quality or intensity of light. Wattage only determines the amount of energy used to operate the light bulb.
The Pure-Light bulb is on the right below, and a typical incandescent bulb is on the left. The light provided by the Pure-Light bulb is MUCH whiter.
This breakthrough technology utilizes a patented enhanced titanium dioxide(TIO2) nano particle photocatalytic coating that has been proven when turned on to clean the air and kill 99.9% of viruses, deadly bacteria, and mold including drug resistant super bugs, flesh eating Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus/MRSA, super bug plague Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), flu viruses, E-coli, SARS, black mold, Anthrax, Salmonella, Plague, and more.
Additionally the technology helps dissolve and breakdown harmful pollutants such as carbon monoxide, methane, benzene, pesticides, cleaning fumes, paint fumes, formaldehyde, glues, and other Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). The revolutionary technology is currently patent pending with additional proprietary technology secrets. We have the exclusive rights to use and market these patents and products in the U.S. and internationally.
These products are ISO 9001 and 14001 certified, have a MSDS rating of "Non-Toxic", and are safe to use indoors and outdoors, with children and pets like any other LED. Note: these products are not intended to substitute for common hygiene practices such as frequent hand washing nor for competent medical advice/treatment.
PLACE JUST ONE ORDER AND BE A GOLD CLUB MEMBER FOR LIFE!
Buy 12 Pure-Light bulbs at a 50% discount ($153 + $12.75 shipping) and receive a FREE LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP.
BEFORE YOU PLACE YOUR FIRST ORDER
Every new member receives 50% off their first order. You can save 50% on your first order or any other order placed within the first 30 days after upgrading to Gold Club Member.
SUBSEQUENT GOLD CLUB ORDERS
The $50 Gold Club membership fee will be waived and you can save 50% on your first order or any other order placed within the first 30 days of membership.
MONTANA: Pure-Light's legal team has indicated that they can ship product to Montana, and sign up club members, but until Pure-Light is officially approved by the state of Montana, Pure-Light cannot send cash rewards to club members. Therefore, Pure-Light will hold all cash rewards until we are officially approved in Montana. Any cash rewards earned will accumulate until that time. We expect this to take about 9-12 months.
CANADA: Pure-Light's legal team has indicated that they can ship product to Canada, and sign up club members, but until they are officially approved Pure-Light cannot send cash rewards to club members. Therefore, Pure-Light will hold all cash rewards until they are officially approved in Canada. Any cash rewards earned will accumulate until that time. We expect this to take about 6-12 months depending upon the Canadian bureaucracy. There may be a 5%-13% fee added by customs. It seems to be variable depending upon the customs agent.
STORES: Club members cannot approach retail stores that have more than 2 locations.
UNITED STATES & CANADA: 515-604-9736 PIN: 632190
UPDATES/Q&A CONFERENCE CALLS EVERY TUESDAY AND THURSDAY Roger Young and Rob Black Latest Club updates and changes Technical aspects of the bulbs Q & A 9pm Eastern 8pm Central 7pm Mountain 6pm Pacific
TRAINING CONFERENCE CALLS EVERY WEDNESDAY MORNING Jeannie Kraus Website & back office training, referral tips, etc. 11am Eastern 10am Central 9am Mountain 8am Pacific
Some of the information on the older conference calls listed below may be out of date.
RECORDED CALLS: 515-604-9883 PIN: 632190#
RECORDED CALL: 302-202-1115 Recording ID: 98439898
PURE-LIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is a subsidiary of Total Solar Technologies, LLC with manufacturing facilities located in Rigby, Idaho. The name was changed from Total Solar Super Green to Pure-Light Technologies, Inc. in October of 2015.
Pure-Light is currently setting up a large scale manufacturing center in Rigby, Idaho and is planning to begin major national advertising.
Roger K. Young: CEO/President of Pure-Light Technologies, Inc. and CEO of Total Solar Technologies, LLC
Jeanne Kraus: DIRECTOR/Human Resources
David Baca: DIRECTOR/Commercial Sales
Rob Black: DIRECTOR/Retail Sales
Dexter Carr: DIRECTOR/ Media & Marketing
Troy Butler: DIRECTOR/Procurement/Testing
Bill LoBell: DIRECTOR/Commercial Sales-Pet Industry
Jonathon Miller: CFO
THE DANGERS OF COMPACT FLUORESCENT LIGHT BULBS (CFL)
Please watch all the videos below...
PURE-LIGHT PROFESSIONALLY APPLIED ANTI-BACTERIAL KITCHEN-BATHROOM TREATMENT. Have a professional team do your entire kitchen and bathroom with our patented, clear PURE-LIGHT anti-bacterial easy cleaning coating. In the kitchen we will do the counter, back-splash, sink, stove, refrigerator, table, stove surfaces, including glass topped stoves, clean with an easy wipe no matter how baked on the food is. Helps reduce scratching too. In the bathroom we can make your bathtub and shower, mirrors, glass almost self cleaning and anti-bacterial. (and yes we can do the toilet too.) NO MORE UGLY MILDEW!! The titanium in the coating makes it SUPER EASY CLEANING. No more harsh chemical cleaners needed. Just use simple distilled water and everything just wipes off. The bathtub/shower almost cleans itself. Makes surfaces super shiny too! Things just sparkle. An average sized kitchen is usually around $600. The treatment is unconditionally warranted for 10 years.
PURE-LIGHT SELF CLEANING-QUICK DRYING WINDOW TREATMENT. When one of our professional application teams does the windows in your business or home, all you need is water (from rain) and the dirt and grime just sheets off. Warranted for 10 years... the time and cost savings are tremendous.
PURE-LIGHT SOLAR PANEL ENHANCEMENT TREATMENT. PROVEN TO MAKE SOLAR PANELS 13%--35% MORE EFFICIENT, REDUCES SOLAR PANEL CLEANING COSTS by 50%-75% Lasts 20 years. This patented formulation is now being used on very large commercial solar panel systems throughout the United States and Internationally by trained applicator teams. Soon, PURE-LIGHT will exclusively offer solar panels pre-treated with this breakthrough product. Soon, we will have professional application teams in most states so that everyone can take advantage of this incredible breakthrough product.
PURE-LIGHT NEVER WAX-EASY CLEANING TRANSPARENT CAR TOP COAT The shine/sparkle is better than the most expensive car wax imaginable. And dirt, grime, grease, bird poop, bug splatter wash off super easy with just water. No need to use soap/detergent. Protects against UV damage and rust. Field tests show that because the car is more "slippery" it adds 2%-3% more gas mileage. 10 year warranty.
PURE-LIGHT NEVER WAX-EASY CLEANING TRANSPARENT BOAT COAT. Makes fiberglass on your boat "slippery" so that barnacles, etc. don't stick very well, making for very easy clean up. Protects against UV damage and makes surfaces more scratch resistant. Makes the boat more slippery in the water so it actually goes faster.
This painted cement wall above was fully cleaned in 2002. The left side was coated with photocatalytic TiO2. The right side was not. The photo was taken in June 2005. Anatase TiO2 has visibly protected the left side of the wall with its self-cleaning photocatalytic effect for three years.
PURE-LIGHT INDUCED REDUCTION IN MOLD COUNT AND ENHANCED GROWTH IN BARLEY GRASS RESEARCH REPORT
Using high efficacy LED grow lights, barley sprouts were grown from seed to harvest using the Pure‐Light coating on the grow light lenses with a control group grown under identical conditions without the Pure‐Light application.
ANALYSIS: With Pure‐Light ‐ 129,908 colony forming units per gram Without Pure‐Light - more than 626,632 colony forming units per gram Use of the Pure-Light resulted in a reduction in mold/yeast counts of almost 80%. At the time of harvest, the test group had roughly twice the sprout height of the control group.
CONCLUSION: Pure‐Light coating offers significant benefits such as enhanced growth and improved control of mold while sprouting grains such as barley grass.
D. M. Blake, P.-C. Maness, Z. Huang, E. J. Wolfrum, J. Huang, and W. A. Jacoby, “Application of the photocatalytic chemistry of titanium dioxide to disinfection and the killing of cancer cells,” Separation and Purification Methods, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–50, 1999.
K. Yogo and M. Ishikawa, “Recent progress in environmental catalytic technology,” Catalysis Surveys from Japan, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2000.
H. J. Kool, C. F. Keijl, and J. Hrubec, Water Chlorination: Chemistry, Environmental Impact and Health Effects, Lewis, Chelsia, Mich, USA, 1985.
P. S. M. Dunlop, J. A. Byrne, N. Manga, and B. R. Eggins, “The photocatalytic removal of bacterial pollutants from drinking water,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 148, no. 1–3, pp. 355–363, 2002.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
F. W. Pontis, Ed., Water Quality and Treatment, A Handbook of Community Water Supplies, Mc-Graw Hill, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 1990.
S. Regli, “Disinfection requirements to control for microbial contamination,” in Regulating Drinking Water Quality, C. E. Gilbert and E. J. Calabrese, Eds., Lewis, Mich, USA, 1992.
W. J. Masschelin, Ultraviolet Light in Water and Wastewater Sanitation, Lewis, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2002.
J. M. C. Robertson, P. K. J. Robertson, and L. A. Lawton, “A comparison of the effectiveness of TiO2photocatalysis and UVA photolysis for the destruction of three pathogenic micro-organisms,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
W.-J. Huang, G.-C. Fang, and C.-C. Wang, “The determination and fate of disinfection by-products from ozonation of polluted raw water,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 345, no. 1-3, pp. 261–272, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
M. A. Fox, C. C. Chen, K. Park, and J. N. Younathan, in Organic Transformations in Non-Homogeneous Media, M. A. Fox, Ed., ACS Symposium Series, p. 278, 1985.
A. Fujishima, T. N. Rao, and D. A. Tryk, “Titanium dioxide photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2000.
A.-G. Rincón and C. Pulgarin, “Use of coaxial photocatalytic reactor (CAPHORE) in the TiO2 photo-assisted treatment of mixed E. coli and Bacillus sp. and bacterial community present in wastewater,”Catalysis Today, vol. 101, no. 3-4, pp. 331–344, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
K. Sunada, T. Watanabe, and K. Hashimoto, “Studies on photokilling of bacteria on TiO2 thin film,”Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 156, no. 1–3, pp. 227–233, 2003.View at Publisher ·View at Google Scholar
T. Matsunaga, R. Tomoda, T. Nakajima, and H. Wake, “Photoelectrochemical sterilization of microbial cells by semiconductor powders,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 29, no. 1-2, pp. 211–214, 1985.
C. Mccullagh, J. M. C. Robertson, D. W. Bahnemann, and P. K. J. Robertson, “The application of TiO2 photocatalysis for disinfection of water contaminated with pathogenic micro-organisms: a review,”Research on Chemical Intermediates, vol. 33, no. 3-5, pp. 359–375, 2007.
D. Y. Goswami and D. M. Blake, “Cleaning up with sunshine,” Mechanical Engineering, vol. 118, no. 8, pp. 56–59, 1996.
D. Y. Goswami, “A review of engineering developments of aqueous phase solar photocatalytic detoxification and disinfection processes,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 101–107, 1997.
M. Romero, J. Blanco, B. Sánchez, et al., “Solar photocatalytic degredation of water and air pollutants: challenges and perspectives,” Solar Energy, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 169–182, 1999.
S. Malato, J. Blanco, D. C. Alarcón, M. I. Maldonado, P. Fernández-Ibáñez, and W. Gernjak, “Photocatalytic decontamination and disinfection of water with solar collectors,” Catalysis Today, vol. 122, no. 1-2, pp. 137–149, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
S. S. Block and D. Y. Goswami, “Chemical enhanced sunlight for killing bacteria,” in Proceedings of the ASME International Solar Energy conference, vol. 1, pp. 431–437, 1995.
R. Armon, N. Laot, N. Narkis, and I. Neeman, “Photocatalytic inactivation of different bacteria and bacteriophages in drinking water at different TiO2 concentration with or without exposure to O2,”Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, vol. 3, pp. 145–150, 1998.
A. T. Cooper, D. Y. Goswami, and S. S. Block, “Solar photochemical detoxification and disinfection for water treatment in tropical developing countries,” Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 151–154, 1998.
M. Biguzzi and G. Shama, “Effect of titanium dioxide concentration on the survival of Pseudomonas stutzeri during irradiation with near ultraviolet light,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 458–460, 1994.
H. N. Pham, T. McDowell, and E. Wilkins, “Photocatalytically-mediated disinfection of water using TiO2 as a catalyst and spore-forming Bacillus pumilus as a model,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 627–636, 1995.
J. C. Sjogren and R. A. Sierka, “Inactivation of phage MS2 by iron-aided titanium dioxide photocatalysis,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 344–347, 1994.
R. J. Watts, S. Kong, M. P. Orr, G. C. Miller, and B. E. Henry, “Photocatalytic inactivation of coliform bacteria and viruses in secondary wastewater effluent,” Water Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 95–100, 1995.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
H. Ryu, D. Gerrity, J. C. Crittenden, and M. Abbaszadegan, “Photocatalytic inactivation ofCryptosporidium parvum with TiO2 and low-pressure ultraviolet irradiation,” Water Research, vol. 42, no. 6-7, pp. 1523–1530, 2008.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
S. M. Karvinen, “The effects of trace element doping on the optical properties and photocatalytic activity of nanostructured titanium dioxide,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1035–1043, 2003.
A. Vohra, D. Y. Goswami, D. A. Deshpande, and S. S. Block, “Enhanced photocatalytic inactivation of bacterial spores on surfaces in air,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 364–370, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
E. V. Skorb, L. I. Antonouskaya, N. A. Belyasova, D. G. Shchukin, H. Möhwald, and D. V. Sviridov, “Antibacterial activity of thin-film photocatalysts based on metal-modified TiO2 and TiO2:In2O3nanocomposite,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 84, no. 1-2, pp. 94–99, 2008.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
J. C. Yu, W. Ho, J. Yu, H. Yip, K. W. Po, and J. Zhao, “Efficient visible-light-induced photocatalytic disinfection on sulfur-doped nanocrystalline titania,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1175–1179, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
G. Li, T. An, X. Nie et al., “Mutagenicity assessment of produced water during photoelectrocatalytic degradation,” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 416–423, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
T. P. T. Cushnie, P. K. J. Robertson, S. Officer, P. M. Pollard, C. McCullagh, and J. M. C. Robertson, “Variables to be considered when assessing the photocatalytic destruction of bacterial pathogens,”Chemosphere, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1374–1378, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
Y.-S. Choi and B.-W. Kim, “Photocatalytic disinfection of E coli in a UV/TiO2-immobilised optical-fibre reactor,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1145–1150, 2000.
M. Subrahmanyam, P. Boule, V. D. Kumari, D. N. Kumar, M. Sancelme, and A. Rachel, “Pumice stone supported titanium dioxide for removal of pathogen in drinking water and recalcitrant in wastewater,”Solar Energy, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 1099–1106, 2008.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
C. Guillard, T.-H. Bui, C. Felix, V. Moules, B. Lina, and P. Lejeune, “Microbiological disinfection of water and air by photocatalysis,” Comptes Rendus Chimie, vol. 11, no. 1-2, pp. 107–113, 2008.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
D. T. Tompkins, W. A. Zeitner, B. J. Lawnicki, and M. A. Anderson, “Evaluation of photocatalysis for gas-phase air cleanin—part 1: process, technical, and sizing considerations,” ASHRAE Transactions, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 60–84, 2005.
D. F. Ollis, “Photocatalytic purification and remediation of contaminated air and water,” Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences IIC 3, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 405–411, 2000.
W. A. Jacoby, P. C. Maness, E. J. Wolfrum, D. M. Blake, and J. A. Fennell, “Mineralization of bacterial cell mass on a photocatalytic surface in air,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 32, no. 17, pp. 2650–2653, 1998.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
D. Y. Goswami, D. M. Trivedi, and S. S. Block, “Photocatalytic disinfection of indoor air,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 92–96, 1997.
D. Y. Goswami, D. M. Trivedi, and S. S. Block, “Photocatalytic disinfection of indoor air,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 92–96, 1997.
T. K. Goswami, S. Hingorani, H. Griest, D. Y. Goswami, and S. S. Block, “Photocatalytic system to destroy bioaerosols in air,” Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 185–188, 1999.
H. T. Griest, S. K. Hingorani, K. Kelly, and D. Y. Goswami, “Using scanning electron microscopy to visualize the photocatalytic mineralization of airborne microorganisms,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Processing of the Indoor Air, pp. 712–717, Monterey, Calif, USA, 2002.
C. Lee, H. Choi, C. Lee, and H. Kim, “Photocatalytic properties of nano-structured TiO2 plasma sprayed coating,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 173, no. 2-3, pp. 192–200, 2003.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
J.-H. Kau, D.-S. Sun, H.-H. Huang, M.-S. Wong, H.-C. Lin, and H.-H. Chang, “Role of visible light-activated photocatalyst on the reduction of anthrax spore-induced mortality in mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
H. Knight, “Sars wars,” Engineer, vol. 292, pp. 27–35, 2003.
A. Pal, S. O. Pehkonen, L. E. Yu, and M. B. Ray, “Photocatalytic inactivation of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using fluorescent light,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 186, no. 2-3, pp. 335–341, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
E. J. Wolfrum, J. Huang, D. M. Blake et al., “Photocatalytic oxidation of bacteria, bacterial and fungal spores, and model biofilm components to carbon dioxide on titanium dioxide-coated surfaces,”Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 15, pp. 3412–3419, 2002.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
J. Kiwi and V. Nadtochenko, “New evidence for TiO2 photocatalysis during bilayer lipid peroxidation,”Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 45, pp. 17675–17684, 2004.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
R. Basca, J. Kiwi, T. Ohno, P. Albers, and V. Nadtochenko, “Preparation, testing and characterization of doped TiO2 able to transform biomolecules under visible light irradiation by peroxidation/oxidation,”Journal Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, pp. 5994–6003, 2005.
J. Kiwi and V. Nadtochenko, “Evidence for the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of the bacterial wall membrane at the TiO2 interface by ATR-FTIR and laser kinetic spectroscopy,” Langmuir, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 4631–4641, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
V. A. Nadtochenko, A. G. Rincon, S. E. Stanca, and J. Kiwi, “Dynamics of E. coli membrane cell peroxidation during TiO2 photocatalysis studied by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and AFM microscopy,”Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 131–137, 2005.View at Publisher ·View at Google Scholar
V. Nadtochenko, C. Pulgarin, P. Bowen, and J. Kiwi, “Laser spectroscopy of the interaction of bacterial wall membranes and E. coli with TiO2,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 181, pp. 401–404, 2006.
V. Krishna, S. Pumprueg, S.-H. Lee et al., “Photocatalytic disinfection with titanium dioxide coated multi-wall carbon nanotubes,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 83, no. 4 B, pp. 393–397, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
S. A. Grinshpun, A. Adhikari, T. Honda et al., “Control of aerosol contaminants in indoor air: combining the particle concentration reduction with microbial inactivation,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 606–612, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
A. Pal, X. Mint, L. E. Yu, S. O. Pehkonen, and M. B. Ray, “Photocatalytic inactivation of bioaerosols by TiO2 coated membrane,” International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol. 3, p. A45, 2005.
T. Yuranova, A. G. Rincon, A. Bozzi et al., “Antibacterial textiles prepared by RF-plasma and vacuum-UV mediated deposition of silver,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2003.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
T. Yuranova, A. G. Rincon, C. Pulgarin, D. Laub, N. Xantopoulos, and H.-J. Mathieu, “Bactericide cotton textiles active in E. coli abatement prepared under mild preparation conditions,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 181, pp. 363–369, 2006.
M. I. Mejia, G. Restrepo, J. M. Marin, R. Sanjines, C. Pulgarin, and E. Mielczarski, “Magnetron-sputtered Ag surfaces. New evidence for the nature of the Ag ions intervening in bacterial inactivation,”JACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 2, pp. 230–235, 2010.
M. Paschoalino, N. C. Guedes, W. Jardim, E. Mielczarski, K. Mielczarski, and P. Bowen, “Photo-assisted inactivation of E. coli by high surface area CuO under light irradiation (>360 nm),” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 199, pp. 105–111, 2008.
A. Moncayo-Lasso, R. A. Torres-Palma, J. Kiwi, N. Benítez, and C. Pulgarin, “Bacterial inactivation and organic oxidation via immobilized photo-Fenton reagent on structured silica surfaces,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 84, no. 3-4, pp. 577–583, 2008.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
P. Kern, P. Schwaller, and J. Michler, “Electrolytic deposition of titania films as interference coatings on biomedical implants: microstructure, chemistry and nano-mechanical properties,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 494, no. 1-2, pp. 279–286, 2006.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
P. Evans and D. W. Sheel, “Photoactive and antibacterial TiO2 thin films on stainless steel,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 201, no. 22-23, pp. 9319–9324, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
K. Shiraishi, H. Koseki, T. Tsurumoto et al., “Antibacterial metal implant with a TiO2-conferred photocatalytic bactericidal effect against Staphylococcus aureus,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
Y. Kubota, T. Shuin, C. Kawasaki et al., “Photokilling of T-24 human bladder cancer cells with titanium dioxide,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1107–1111, 1994.
H. Irie, K. Sunada, and K. Hashimoto, “Recent developments in TiO2 photocatalysis: novel applications to interior ecology materials and energy saving systems,” Electrochemistry, vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 807–812, 2004.
Y. Kikuchi, K. Sunada, T. Iyoda, K. Hashimoto, and A. Fujishima, “Photocatalytic bactericidal effect of TiO2 thin films: dynamic view of the active oxygen species responsible for the effect,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 106, no. 1–3, pp. 51–56, 1997.
P. Evans, T. English, D. Hammond, M. E. Pemble, and D. W. Sheel, “The role of SiO2 barrier layers in determining the structure and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 films deposited on stainless steel,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 321, no. 2, pp. 140–146, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
L. Caballero, K. A. Whitehead, N. S. Allen, and J. Verran, “Inactivation of Escherichia coli on immobilized TiO2 using fluorescent light,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 202, no. 2-3, pp. 92–98, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
J. C. Yu, W. Ho, J. Lin, H. Yip, and P. K. Wong, “Photocatalytic activity, antibacterial effect, and photoinduced hydrophilicity of TiO2 films coated on a stainless steel substrate,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 2296–2301, 2003.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
K. Sunada, T. Watanabe, and K. Hashimoto, “Bactericidal activity of copper-deposited TiO2 thin film under weak UV light illumination,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 37, no. 20, pp. 4785–4789, 2003.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
M.-S. Wong, W.-C. Chu, D.-S. Sun et al., “Visible-light-induced bactericidal activity of a nitrogen-doped titanium photocatalyst against human pathogens,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 6111–6116, 2006.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
J. A. Rengifo-Herrera, E. Mielczarski, J. Mielczarski, N. C. Castillo, J. Kiwi, and C. Pulgarin, “Escherichia coli inactivation by N, S co-doped commercial TiO2 powders under UV and visible light,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 84, no. 3-4, pp. 448–456, 2008.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
J. A. Rengifo-Herrera, K. Pierzcha³a, A. Sienkiewicz, L. Forró, J. Kiwi, and C. Pulgarin, “Abatement of organics and Escherichia coli by N, S co-doped TiO2 under UV and visible light. Implications of the formation of singlet oxygen (1O2) under visible light,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 88, no. 3-4, pp. 398–406, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
J. A. Rengifo-Herrera, J. Kiwi, and C. Pulgarin, “N, S co-doped and N-doped Degussa P-25 powders with visible light response prepared by mechanical mixing of thiourea and urea. Reactivity towards E. coli inactivation and phenol oxidation,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 205, no. 2-3, pp. 109–115, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
J. A. Renigo-Herrera, A. Sienkiewicz, L. Forro, J. Kiwi, J. E. Moser, and C. Pulgarin, “New evidence for the nature of the N, S, co-doped TiO2 sited under visible light leading to E. coli inactivation. Catalyst characterization,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 114, pp. 2717–2723, 2010.
B. A. Walther and P. W. Ewald, “Pathogen survival in the external environment and the evolution of virulence,” Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 849–869, 2004.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
N. Laot, N. Narkis, I. Neeman, and R. Armon, “TiO2 photocatalytic inactivation of selected microorganisms under various conditions: sunlight, intermittent and variable irradiation intensity, CdS supplementation and entrapment of TiO2 into sol-gel,” Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, vol. 4, pp. 97–102, 1999.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hospital Control Practices Advisory Committee, “Guidelines for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia,” CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reporter, vol. 46, pp. 1–79, 1997.
C. Chawengkijwanich and Y. Hayata, “Development of TiO2 powder-coated food packaging film and its ability to inactivate Escherichia coli in vitro and in actual tests,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 288–292, 2008.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
A. K. Benabbou, Z. Derriche, C. Felix, P. Lejeune, and C. Guillard, “Photocatalytic inactivation of Escherischia coli. Effect of concentration of TiO2 and microorganism, nature, and intensity of UV irradiation,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 76, no. 3-4, pp. 257–263, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
Y. Liu, J. Li, X. Qiu, and C. Burda, “Bactericidal activity of nitrogen-doped metal oxide nanocatalysts and the influence of bacterial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS),” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 94–100, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
H. Matsubara, M. Takada, and S. Koyama, “Research on application of photoactive TiO2 to paper,”Kinoshi Kenkyu Kaishi, vol. 34, pp. 36–39, 1996.
J. Blanco, S. Malato, P. Fernández-Ibañez, D. Alarcón, W. Gernjak, and M. I. Maldonado, “Review of feasible solar energy applications to water processes,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 6-7, pp. 1437–1445, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
K. S. Yao, D. Y. Wang, W. Y. Ho, J. J. Yan, and K. C. Tzeng, “Photocatalytic bactericidal effect of TiO2thin film on plant pathogens,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 201, no. 15, pp. 6886–6888, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
K. S. Yao, D. Y. Wang, C. Y. Chang et al., “Photocatalytic disinfection of phytopathogenic bacteria by dye-sensitized TiO2 thin film activated by visible light,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 202, no. 4-7, pp. 1329–1332, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
C. Sichel, M. de Cara, J. Tello, J. Blanco, and P. Fernández-Ibáñez, “Solar photocatalytic disinfection of agricultural pathogenic fungi: Fusarium species,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 74, no. 1-2, pp. 152–160, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
D. Sawada, M. Ohmasa, M. Fukuda et al., “Disinfection of some pathogens of mushroom cultivation by photocatalytic treatment,” Mycoscience, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2005.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
R. Dillert, S. Vollmer, M. Schober et al., “Pilot plant studies on the photocatalytic oxidation of a pretrated industrial wastewater,” GWF Wasser Abwasser, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 293–297, 1999.
R. Dillert, S. Vollmer, E. Gross et al., “Solar-catalytic treatment of an industrial wastewater,” Zeitschrift fur Physikalische Chemie, vol. 213, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 1999.
R. Dillert, S. Vollmer, M. Schober, et al., “Photokatalytische behandlung eines industriabwassers im stegdoppelplattenreaktor,” Chemie Ingenieur Tecnik, vol. 71, pp. 396–399, 1999.
J. Blanco and S. Malato, “Solar photocatalytic mineralization of real hazardous waste water at pre-industrial level,” in Proceedings of the ASME/JSME/JSES International Solar Energy Conference, D. E. Klett, R. E. Hogan, and T. Tanaka, Eds., pp. 103–109, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1994.
M. Anhegen, D. Y. Goswami, and G. Svedberg, “Photocatalytic treatment of wastewater from 5-fluoracil manufacturing,” in Proceedings of the ASME/JSME/JSES International Solar Energy Conference, Maui, Hawaii, 1995.
A. H. Zaidi, D. Y. Goswami, and A. C. Wilkie, “Solar photocatalytic post-treatment of anaerobically digested distillery effluent,” in Proceedings of the American Solar Energy Society Annual Conference, pp. 51–56, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, 1995.
C. S. Turchi, L. Edmunson, and D. F. Ollis, “Application of heterogeneous photocatalysis for the destruction of organic contaminants from a paper mill alkali extraction process,” in Proceedings of the TAPPI 5th International Symposium on Wood and Pulping Chemistry, Raleigh, NC, USA, 1989.
O. Seven, B. Dindar, S. Aydemir, D. Metin, M. A. Ozinel, and S. Icli, “Solar photocalytic disinfection of a group of bacteria and fungi aqueous suspensions with TiO2, ZnO and sahara desert dust,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 165, no. 1–3, pp. 103–107, 2004.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
M. Otaki, T. Hirata, and S. Ohgaki, “Aqueous microorganisms inactivation by photocatalytic reaction,”Water Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 3-4, pp. 103–108, 2000.
T. Kato, T. Shibata, H. Tohma, M. Tamura, and O. Miki, “Degredation of norovirus in sewage treatment water by photocatalytic ultraviolent disinfection,” Nippon Steel Technical Report, pp. 41–44, 92.
R. Dillert, U. Siemon, and D. Bahnemann, “Photocatalytic disinfection of municipal wastewater,”Chemical Engineering and Technology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 356–358, 1998.
J. A. Herrera Melián, J. M. Doña Rodríguez, A. Viera Suárez et al., “The photocatalytic disinfection of urban waste waters,” Chemosphere, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 323–327, 2000.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
A.-G. Rincón and C. Pulgarin, “Bactericidal action of illuminated TiO2 on pure Escherichia coli and natural bacterial consortia: post-irradiation events in the dark and assessment of the effective disinfection time,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 99–112, 2004.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
A. G. Rincón and C. Pulgarin, “Photocatalytical inactivation of E. coli: effect of (continuous-intermittent) light intensity and of (suspended-fixed) TiO2 concentration,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 263–284, 2003.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
Y. LI, M. Ma, X. Wang, and X. Wang, “Inactivated properties of activated carbon-supported TiO2 nanoparticles for bacteria and kinetic study,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1527–1533, 2008.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
H. Choi, A. C. Sofranko, and D. D. Dionysiou, “Nanocrystalline TiO2 photocatalytic membranes with a hierarchical mesoporous multilayer structure: synthesis, characterization, and multifunction,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1067–1074, 2006.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
H. Choi, E. Stathatos, and D. D. Dionysiou, “Photocatalytic TiO2 films and membranes for the development of efficient wastewater treatment and reuse systems,” Desalination, vol. 202, no. 1-3, pp. 199–206, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
Y. Liu, J. Li, X. Qiu, and C. Burda, “Novel TiO2 nanocatalysts for wastewater purification: tapping energy from the sun,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 47–54, 2006.View at Publisher ·View at Google Scholar
P. H. Gleick, World’s Water 2004-2005, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
L. Villen, F. Manjon, D. Garcia-Fresnadillo, and G. Orellana, “Solar water disinfection by photocatalytic singlet oxygen production in heterogenous medium,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 69, pp. 1–9, 2006.
I. Najm and R. R. Trussel, “New and emerging drinking water treatment technologies,” in Identifying Future Drinking Water Contaminants, p. 220, National Academy, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
M. Boyle, C. Sichel, P. Fernández-Ibáñez et al., “Bactericidal effect of solar water disinfection under real sunlight conditions,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 2997–3001, 2008.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
E. Ubomba-Jaswa, C. Navntoft, I. Polo-López, P. Fernández-Ibáñez, and K. G. McGuigan, “Solar disinfection of drinking water (SODIS): an investigation of the effect of UVA dose on inactivation efficiency,” Photochemistry and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 587–595, 2009.
H. Gómez-Couso, M. Fontán-Saínz, C. Sichel, P. Fernández-Ibáñez, and E. Ares-Mazás, “Solar disinfection of turbid waters experimentally contaminated with Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts under real field conditions,” Tropical Medicineand International Health, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1–9, 2009.
E. Ubomba-Jaswa, P. Fernández-Ibáñez, C. Navntoft, M. Inmaculada Polo-Lópezb, and K. G. McGuigana, “Investigating the microbial inactivation efficiency of a 25 L batch solar disinfection (SODIS) reactor enhanced with a compound parabolic collector (CPC) for household use,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 1028–1037, 2010.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
O. A. McLoughlin, P. Fernández-Ibáñez, W. Gernjak, S. Malato Rodriguez, and L. W. Gill, “Photocatalytic disinfection of water using low cost compound parabolic collectors,” Solar Energy, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 625–633, 2004.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
A.-G. Rincón and C. Pulgarin, “Field solar E. coli inactivation in the absence and presence of TiO2: is UV solar dose an appropriate parameter for standardization of water solar disinfection?” Solar Energy, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 635–648, 2004.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
C. Navntoft, P. Araujo, M. I. Litter et al., “Field tests of the solar water detoxification SOLWATER reactor in Los Pereyra, Tucumán, Argentina,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 127–134, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
E. F. Duffy, F. Al Touati, S. C. Kehoe et al., “A novel TiO2-assisted solar photocatalytic batch-process disinfection reactor for the treatment of biological and chemical contaminants in domestic drinking water in developing countries,” Solar Energy, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 649–655, 2004.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
F. Méndez-Hermida, E. Ares-Mazás, K. G. McGuigan, M. Boyle, C. Sichel, and P. Fernández-Ibáñez, “Disinfection of drinking water contaminated with Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts under natural sunlight and using the photocatalyst TiO2,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 88, no. 2-3, pp. 105–111, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
H. Gómez-Couso, M. Fontán-Sainz, J. Fernández-Alonso, and E. Ares-Mazás, “Excystation of Cryptosporidium parvum at temperatures that are reached during solar water disinfection,” Parasitology, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 393–399, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
K. G. McGuigan, F. Méndez-Hermida, J. A. Castro-Hermida et al., “Batch solar disinfection inactivates oocysts of Cryptosporidium parvum and cysts of Giardia muris in drinking water,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 453–463, 2006.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
A.-G. Rincón and C. Pulgarin, “Effect of pH, inorganic ions, organic matter and H2O2 on E. coli K12 photocatalytic inactivation by TiO2: implications in solar water disinfection,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 283–302, 2004.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
J. Marugán, R. van Grieken, C. Sordo, and C. Cruz, “Kinetics of the photocatalytic disinfection ofEscherichia coli suspensions,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 82, no. 1-2, pp. 27–36, 2008.View at Publisher ·View at Google Scholar
J. C. Ireland, P. Klostermann, E. W. Rice, and R. M. Clark, “Inactivation of Escherichia coli by titanium dioxide photocatalytic oxidation,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1668–1670, 1993.
J. Wist, J. Sanabria, C. Dierolf, W. Torres, and C. Pulgarin, “Evaluation of photocatalytic disinfection of crude water for drinking-water production,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 241–246, 2002.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
C. A. Murray, E. H. Goslan, and S. A. Parsons, “TiO2/UV: single stage drinking water treatment for NOM removal?” Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311–317, 2007.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
S.-C. Kim and D.-K. Lee, “Inactivation of algal blooms in eutrophic water of drinking water supplies with the photocatalysis of TiO2 thin film on hollow glass beads,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 145–152, 2005.
A. J. Feitz, T. D. Waite, G. J. Jones, B. H. Boyden, and P. T. Orr, “Photocatalytic degredation of the blue-green algal toxin Microcystin-LR in a natural organic-aqueous matrix,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 243–249, 1999.
D. Y. Goswami, J. Klausner, G. D. Mathur, et al., “Solar photocatalytic treatment of groundwater at Tyndall AFB, field test results,” in Proceedings of the American Solar Energy Society Annual Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
P. Fernández-Ibáñez, C. Sichel, M. I. Polo-López, M. de Cara-García, and J. C. Tello, “Photocatalytic disinfection of natural well water contaminated by Fusarium solani using TiO2 slurry in solar CPC photo-reactors,” Catalysis Today, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 62–68, 2009.View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
M. I. Polo-López, P. Fernández-Ibáñez, I. García-Fernández, I. Oller, I. Salgado-Tránsito, and C. Sichel, “Resistance of Fusarium sp spores to solar TiO2 photocatalysis: influence of spore type and water (scaling-up results),” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 85, pp. 1038–1048, 2010.
This is NOT the official Pure-Light corporate website.
This site is owned and operated by an independent Pure-Light Gold Club Member for the benefit of the members of our team.
Contact the person who invited you to look at this website for additional information.